I frequently get asked by my clients (and prospective ones) about wanting to update their website.
I had a rant about this a while back, where a journalist accused web designers of ripping their clients off if they didn’t provide the ability to update the site themselves.
I stand by my comments that for some clients, a content management system is not wanted, nor is it in the best interests of that client.
However, for those that do want to update their site, we need to provide a solution that is both easy to use and delivers the complexity required for their needs.
These two facets, ease of use and complexity can be seen to be at loggerheads with each other, and in some circumstances that can be the case. But I will propose two solutions that cater for both ends of the spectrum.
In the past, due to the lack of affordable and easy to use CMS’ we have provided Adobe Contribute (Formerly Macromedia) as a way to allow our clients to edit their sites.
The reason for choosing Contribute was it’s simplicity. In tandem with Dreamweaver (which we use to develop with) it allows for areas of the site, such as menus, header, footer and overall structure, to be protected from the end user.
This allows for editing to be done, knowing that catastropic mistakes can’t be made.
The interface is simple and allows for most functions to be performed including editing of text, images, links and if allowed HTML snippets for things like Youtube videos or Paypal buttons.
The biggest downside is that it costs around $400 NZD for a retail copy. This is also a per license price, so if you want to edit from multiple places, you need additional licenses.
For the schools that we have done sites for this was an issue. Some paid for additonal license to get the software into key locations, but for others it was restricted to the office.
This is where web based content management systems have a significant edge.
Especially open source software, that is free from licensing costs, makes this a much easier proposition.
We currently propose two different CMS’ for our clients depending on their needs:
WordPress – The easiest to use, easiest to modify, my choice for brochure style sites.
Joomla – More complex, but manages user management much better
Overall I like WordPress better. Around a year ago, WordPress became a system that you could leave with a user and they would be able to manage their site with little input from their designer. Before that, upgrade and installation required a level of tech knowledge that was no suitable for all users.
That and the well presented plugins system, mean that a user can improve their site and feel in control of their site, without a reliance on an IT person.
There are plenty of complex sites designed with WordPress as their base system, but there are some things that Joomla does much better straight out of the box.
Joomla seems to be able to manage a multitude of types of data much easily. Especially when their are user logins involved.
Extensions like Community Builder allow for a mature user system to be maintained on a site. Plus add-ons for payment and subscriptions mean you can monetize your user base easily.
So depending on the functionality you are wanting for your site, you can find a system that will make the development of a website easier to develop and easier to use.
There are plenty of other systems out there, I have heard good things about Drupal (though I found it less rich than Joomla, it’s direct competitor) and have seen some great implementations of Expression Engine (a paid CMS, so check out prices)
But for my money, choose WordPress for a simple business website, or Joomla if you need to manage a community of users.